If you choose the arm-elf option from the Summarized results menu you will get the following charts.

The code size is getting smaller but the compilation time is increasing with time.

 

Code size for arm-elf target

Compilation time for arm-elf target

 

If you choose the arm-linux option from the Summarized results menu you will get the following charts.

On the following charts, the most interesting thing is that the compilation time is faster and faster from 2004-10-17 until 2004-11-14. There is a degradation after 2004-11-14 (1.56%) but on 2004-11-28 it was also faster than before.

 

Code size for arm-linux target

Compilation time for arm-linux target

Execution time for arm-linux target

 

If you choose the bfin-elf option from the Summarized results menu you will get the following charts.

This is an external target. On these charts it can be observed that the code size is getting smaller but the compilation time is increasing with time.

 

Code size for bfin-elf target

Compilation time for bfin-elf target

 

If you choose the i386-elf option from the Summarized results menu you will get the following charts.

On 2004-05-09 the compilation time was longer by 17.42% (-Os flag) and by 20.15% (-O2 flag) than the day before but there was only 0.5% difference between the code sizes.

 

Code size for i386-elf target

Compilation time for i386-elf target

 

If you choose the i686-linux option from the Summarized results menu you will get the following charts.

On 2004-08-08 the code size generated with the -O2 flag was bigger by 1.24%.

 

Code size for i686-linux target

Compilation time for i686-linux target

Execution time for i686-linux target

 

If you choose the m68k-elf option from the Summarized results menu you will get the following charts.

The code size was almost constant but the compilation time was faster and faster. For example between 2004-10-31 and 2004-11-07 it improved by 3.33%.

 

Code size for m68k-elf target

Compilation time for m68k-elf target

 

If you choose the mips-elf option from the Summarized results menu you will get the following charts.

The code size became 2.79% smaller between 2004-03-28 and 2004-04-04. There is a 17.74% difference between the compilation time on 2004-05-09 and on 2004-05-16 using the -O2 flag and 17.94% using the -Os flag.

 

Code size for mips-elf target

Compilation time for mips-elf target

 

If you choose the ppc-elf option from the Summarized results menu you will get the following charts.

The compilation time on 2004-05-16 was longer by 17.45% (-O2 flag) and by 12.61% (-Os flag) than before.

 

Code size for ppc-elf target

Compilation time for ppc-elf target

 

If you choose the sh-elf option from the Summarized results menu you will get the following charts.

On 2004-05-09 the compilation time with the -Os flag was longer by 8.49% than before.

 

Code size for sh-elf target

Compilation time for sh-elf target

 

If you choose the thumb-elf option from the Summarized results menu you will get the following charts.

The code size on 2004-04-18 was smaller by 2.0% than before.

 

Code size for thumb target

Compilation time for thumb target

Close this window

Reference URL

mail to webmaster
2005-03-08
© 2003 - 2024, University of Szeged